+91 900 400 1000
FREE
QUOTE
Showing 1 to 1 of 1 results
Advertising Age India

Advertising Age India

India

Add to favorites
Top City
Delhi city landmark
Delhi
Mumbai city landmark
Mumbai
Bengluru city landmark
Bengluru
Ahmedabad city landmark
Ahmedabad
Jaipur city landmark
Jaipur
Chennai city landmark
Chennai
Hydrabad city landmark
Hydrabad
Kolkatta city landmark
Kolkatta
Lucknow city landmark
Lucknow
Pune city landmark
Pune

What Advertising Age India Tells Us About the Real State of Indian Media Today

The Indian advertising market crossed ₹1 lakh crore in total spend somewhere around 2023, which is a number that tends to silence even the most sceptical CFOs when you put it on a slide. What is less discussed — and frankly more interesting — is where that money is actually going, how the media mix has shifted in ways that most brands have not fully caught up with, and what the gap between conventional wisdom and ground-level reality looks like when you are actually buying media across 500 cities every single week.

How Has Indian Advertising Evolved Over the Last Decade?

There is a version of this story that gets told at every industry conference, and it goes something like this: television dominated, digital disrupted everything, and now we live in a fragmented multi-screen world. That version is not wrong, exactly, but it leaves out the texture — the fact that cinema advertising bounced back harder than almost anyone predicted post-pandemic, that radio continues to deliver remarkable cost-per-reach numbers in Tier 2 and Tier 3 markets, and that outdoor has quietly become one of the most data-driven formats in the country.

The FICCI-EY Media and Entertainment Report has consistently tracked the Indian advertising industry's trajectory, and what the data shows is not a clean linear shift from traditional to digital but something far messier and more interesting — a simultaneous expansion across almost every channel, with digital growing fastest but traditional formats holding their ground in ways that pure-play digital agencies tend to underestimate. The GroupM TYNY Report, which is one of the more reliable annual benchmarks for advertising expenditure in India, has noted that television still commands somewhere in the range of 35 to 40 percent of total advertising spend, which is a figure that surprises people who spend most of their time in the digital ecosystem.

At SmartAds, we have found that the brands which perform best are the ones that resist the temptation to chase whatever format is currently generating the most industry buzz; the ones that build their media plans around audience behaviour rather than platform fashion tend to see significantly better returns over a 12-month planning cycle. We have worked with clients who came to us having shifted almost entirely to digital, only to discover that their brand recall scores had quietly deteriorated in markets where television and outdoor still dominate daily media consumption.

What Does the Current Indian Digital Advertising Landscape Actually Look Like?

Digital advertising in India is not one market — it is at least five or six distinct markets operating simultaneously, which is something that gets lost when people talk about "digital" as though it were a monolithic channel. Programmatic display, search, social media, connected TV, audio streaming, and influencer marketing all operate with different cost structures, different audience behaviours, and different measurement frameworks; treating them as interchangeable parts of a single digital budget is one of the more expensive mistakes we see brands make.

The TAM AdEx data on digital advertising volumes has shown consistent year-on-year growth in the range of 15 to 20 percent, which sounds impressive until you realise that the base has been expanding at roughly the same rate, meaning the competition for quality inventory has intensified considerably. The CPM for premium digital inventory — which includes pre-roll video on major platforms, homepage takeovers on news portals, and branded content placements — works out to somewhere between ₹150 and ₹400 depending on the platform and targeting parameters, which is a number that surprises most clients when they compare it to what they imagined digital would cost versus television. The more commoditised end of the market, which includes run-of-network display and lower-funnel programmatic, can be bought at CPMs in the ballpark of ₹8 to ₹25, but the quality of attention those impressions generate is a separate conversation entirely.

One automotive brand we worked with had been running a purely performance-based digital campaign for about eight months, optimising aggressively for cost-per-click and conversion metrics; the numbers looked excellent on the dashboard, but when they ran a brand health tracker, they found that unaided awareness in their target markets had actually declined. The problem was that their digital buying had drifted almost entirely into retargeting and lower-funnel formats, which are efficient at converting existing intent but do almost nothing to build the brand salience that generates intent in the first place. We rebuilt their media plan to include a stronger upper-funnel digital component alongside television and outdoor, and within two quarters their brand health metrics had recovered substantially.

Why Do Most Brands Misread the Indian Digital Audience?

The assumption that the Indian digital audience is essentially homogeneous — young, urban, English-speaking, smartphone-first — was probably never fully accurate, and it is increasingly inaccurate as internet penetration deepens into smaller cities and rural markets. The BARC viewership data, which tracks connected TV alongside traditional television, has shown that digital video consumption is growing fastest in markets that most brands still treat as primarily television territory; this creates a genuine opportunity for advertisers who are willing to look beyond the metro-centric planning assumptions that dominate most media briefs.

What a lot of people miss is that the Indian digital audience is extraordinarily diverse in its language preferences, and this has direct implications for media buying. Hindi-language digital content commands significantly different CPM rates than English-language content; regional language inventory — Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, Bengali, Marathi — is often underpriced relative to the quality of the audience it delivers, which is something we have been telling our clients for several years now. A retail client in Pune who shifted roughly 30 percent of their digital budget from English-language platforms to Marathi-language digital inventory saw their cost-per-store-visit drop by something in the range of 40 percent, which is the kind of result that tends to change how a brand thinks about language as a media planning variable rather than just a creative one.

The IRS data on media consumption habits across income segments adds another layer of complexity to this picture; the assumption that higher-income audiences are exclusively digital is not supported by the data, which shows that television and print continue to be primary media for a significant proportion of even the upper-income segments in non-metro markets. At SmartAds, our experience across 500-plus cities has taught us that media consumption patterns in a city like Coimbatore or Indore or Bhopal look quite different from what the national-level data might suggest, and that local market intelligence is genuinely irreplaceable when you are trying to allocate budget efficiently.

How Should Brands Think About Digital Media Mix in India?

The honest answer is that there is no universal formula, which is probably not what most brand managers want to hear when they are trying to build a defensible budget recommendation for their leadership team. What we can say with reasonable confidence, based on our experience across categories and markets, is that the brands which treat digital as a single line item in their media plan tend to underperform relative to the ones that think about it as a portfolio of distinct formats with different roles in the consumer journey.

Search advertising, for instance, captures existing demand with a precision that no other format can match; the average cost-per-click for competitive categories in India works out to somewhere between ₹15 and ₹80 depending on the category and the competitiveness of the keyword landscape, which is still remarkably efficient compared to most markets globally. Social media advertising, which operates on a fundamentally different logic because it interrupts rather than responds to intent, needs to be evaluated on different metrics — reach, frequency, brand recall, and upper-funnel engagement rather than immediate conversion. Connected TV advertising, which is growing rapidly as OTT platform subscriptions have expanded, delivers television-quality video inventory with digital-grade targeting, which makes it one of the more interesting format innovations of the last few years.

The Dentsu e4m Digital Report has highlighted the growing importance of what is sometimes called the "full-funnel" approach to digital planning, which essentially means using different digital formats for different stages of the consumer journey rather than trying to make one format do everything. We have found this framework genuinely useful when advising clients, not because it is a new idea, but because it gives media planners a principled basis for justifying budget allocation across formats that might otherwise seem to be competing with each other for the same pot of money.

What Are the Real Costs of Digital Advertising in India Right Now?

Frankly speaking, the cost of digital advertising in India varies so dramatically across formats, platforms, and targeting parameters that any single number is almost meaningless without context. What we can offer is a set of benchmarks drawn from our actual buying experience, which tends to be more useful than the theoretical rate cards that platforms publish and almost nobody actually pays.

For programmatic display advertising bought through a reputable DSP with reasonable audience targeting, the effective CPM works out to roughly ₹8 to ₹20 for standard formats, which is genuinely inexpensive reach when you compare it to the cost of reaching a similar audience through print or television. Pre-roll video on major streaming platforms, which delivers significantly higher attention and brand recall than display, is priced somewhere in the ballpark of ₹150 to ₹350 per thousand impressions depending on the platform and the targeting; this is a number that looks expensive in isolation but looks quite different when you factor in completion rates and the quality of the attention being delivered. Influencer marketing, which has become a meaningful line item in many brand budgets, operates on a completely different cost structure — a mid-tier influencer with somewhere between 100,000 and 500,000 followers in a relevant niche might charge anywhere from ₹25,000 to ₹2 lakh per post, which makes standardised benchmarking almost impossible.

One thing we consistently tell our clients is that the cost of digital advertising is only half the equation; the other half is the cost of the creative, the technology stack required to manage the campaign, and the measurement infrastructure needed to evaluate it properly. A brand that spends ₹50 lakh on digital media but ₹2 lakh on creative and nothing on proper measurement is almost certainly leaving significant value on the table, because the optimisation opportunities that digital offers are only accessible if you have the data infrastructure to identify them.

How Does Digital Compare to Traditional Media for Indian Brand Building?

This is the question we get asked most often, and the honest answer is that it is the wrong question — or at least, it is a question that assumes a competition where there should be a collaboration. The FICCI-EY data consistently shows that brands which maintain presence across multiple media channels outperform single-channel advertisers on brand health metrics, which is not surprising when you consider how differently people consume media across different parts of their day and their lives.

Television delivers reach at a scale that digital still cannot match for mass-market brands; a single prime-time spot on a major Hindi general entertainment channel can deliver somewhere in the range of 15 to 25 million impressions in a single night, which is a number that would require a very substantial digital budget to replicate with comparable quality of attention. Outdoor advertising, which has evolved considerably with the introduction of digital OOH screens in major cities, delivers contextual reach in high-traffic environments that neither television nor digital can replicate; the cost-per-thousand for a well-placed outdoor campaign in a metro city works out to roughly ₹3 to ₹8, which makes it one of the most efficient formats in the media mix for building local market presence.

At SmartAds, we have seen the best results when digital is used to extend and personalise the messaging that television and outdoor establish at scale; a consumer who has seen a brand's television commercial and then encounters a relevant digital ad that speaks to their specific context or behaviour is significantly more likely to engage than one who encounters the digital ad cold. This is not just intuition — it is something we have measured across multiple campaigns, and the lift in digital engagement metrics when there is a concurrent television or outdoor campaign running is consistently in the range of 25 to 40 percent.

What Role Does Programmatic Advertising Play in the Indian Market?

Programmatic advertising has matured considerably in India over the last five years, which is both good news and a source of genuine complexity for advertisers who are not deeply familiar with how the ecosystem works. The good news is that the technology now allows for audience targeting and campaign optimisation at a level of granularity that was simply not available through traditional media buying; the complexity is that the programmatic supply chain in India, as in most markets, involves multiple layers of intermediaries, each of which takes a margin, which means that the amount of the advertiser's budget that actually reaches quality inventory can vary enormously depending on how the campaign is set up.

The industry has moved significantly toward what is sometimes called "supply path optimisation," which essentially means reducing the number of intermediaries between the advertiser and the publisher to improve both cost efficiency and inventory quality. We have found that direct deals with premium publishers, supplemented by programmatic buying for scale and audience extension, tend to deliver better overall results than a purely open-exchange programmatic approach, which is often dominated by long-tail inventory of questionable quality.

Brand safety is a concern that has grown considerably in the Indian programmatic market, which has a long tail of local publishers whose content quality and contextual suitability can vary dramatically. We have seen campaigns where a significant proportion of impressions were delivered against content that the brand would never have chosen to appear alongside if they had been making manual placement decisions; building a robust inclusion list and working with a media partner who has done the groundwork on publisher quality is something we consider non-negotiable for any programmatic campaign we manage.

How Are Indian Advertisers Using Data and Measurement Differently Now?

The measurement conversation in Indian advertising has shifted considerably, driven partly by the deprecation of third-party cookies — which is still an ongoing and somewhat messy transition — and partly by a genuine maturation in how Indian brands think about marketing effectiveness. The old model, which treated digital as the measurable channel and everything else as a faith-based investment, has given way to a more sophisticated understanding that all media generates effects that are difficult to measure directly, and that the metrics most easily available are not always the ones that matter most.

Marketing Mix Modelling, which was once the preserve of large FMCG companies with significant research budgets, has become more accessible and is increasingly being used by mid-sized Indian brands to understand the relative contribution of different media channels to business outcomes. The results of these models, in our experience, consistently show that the contribution of television and outdoor to sales is significantly underestimated when brands rely solely on digital attribution models, which tend to give credit to the last digital touchpoint before conversion regardless of what drove the consumer to that point. A consumer goods client we worked with ran a proper MMM exercise for the first time and found that their television campaign, which they had been considering cutting because it was "unmeasurable," was actually driving a return on investment that was higher than their search campaign — which had always appeared to be the star performer in their digital attribution reports.

The BARC data on television viewership measurement has continued to evolve, with the sample size and geographic coverage expanding in ways that make the data more reliable for planning in non-metro markets; this is important because a lot of the scepticism about television effectiveness was based on measurement gaps that are now being addressed. At SmartAds, we have been pushing our clients to invest in proper measurement infrastructure as a proportion of their media budget — typically somewhere in the range of 3 to 5 percent — because the insights generated tend to pay for themselves many times over in improved allocation decisions.

What Should a Brand Manager Know Before Planning a Digital Campaign in India?

The single most important thing, in our experience, is to be honest about what the campaign is actually trying to achieve — not in the vague language of "building brand awareness" or "driving conversions," but in specific, measurable terms that can be evaluated at the end of the campaign period. The reason this matters so much is that the optimal media mix, the right formats, the appropriate budget levels, and the correct measurement framework all depend entirely on what success looks like; a campaign designed to drive trial among new users in Tier 2 cities looks completely different from a campaign designed to maintain salience among existing customers in metros.

The second thing — which is where a lot of brands get into trouble — is to have a realistic expectation of what digital advertising can and cannot do on its own. Digital is extraordinarily good at reaching people who are already in the market for a product, at retargeting people who have already expressed interest, and at delivering personalised messages at scale; it is considerably less efficient at building the kind of broad-based brand salience that drives consideration among people who are not currently in the market. This is not a criticism of digital — it is simply an accurate description of its role in the media mix, which is best understood as complementary to rather than a replacement for brand-building media.

The third consideration is the creative, which is consistently underinvested relative to media in most Indian brand budgets. The research on this is fairly consistent — creative quality is responsible for somewhere between 40 and 70 percent of the variance in campaign effectiveness, which means that a mediocre creative running on a perfectly optimised media plan will consistently underperform a strong creative running on a less-than-perfect plan. We have seen this play out enough times in our own campaigns to feel confident in saying that the conversation about media planning cannot be separated from the conversation about creative quality.

FAQ: Advertising in India — What Media Planners and Brand Managers Ask Most

Q: What is the minimum budget required to run an effective digital advertising campaign in India?

The honest answer is that it depends entirely on the objective, the target audience, and the geographic scope of the campaign, which makes any single number somewhat misleading. That said, based on our experience, a brand looking to run a meaningful digital campaign in a single metro city with a specific target audience segment can do so with a budget in the ballpark of ₹5 to ₹10 lakh per month, which is enough to generate statistically meaningful reach and frequency if the budget is allocated intelligently across the right formats. Campaigns with national ambitions and broad target audiences need considerably more — somewhere in the range of ₹25 to ₹50 lakh per month — to achieve the kind of reach and frequency that moves brand metrics. The mistake we see most often is brands trying to run national campaigns on metro budgets, which results in impressions that are spread too thin to generate any meaningful frequency with any audience segment.

Q: How does digital advertising in India compare to television in terms of reach and cost efficiency?

Television still delivers unmatched reach for mass-market brands, particularly in markets outside the top eight metros; a well-planned television campaign can reach 80 to 90 percent of a target demographic in a major language market within a four-week period, which digital cannot replicate at comparable cost for truly mass audiences. Digital, on the other hand, offers targeting precision that television cannot match — the ability to reach specific demographic, behavioural, and contextual segments with tailored messages is genuinely valuable for brands with heterogeneous target audiences. The cost comparison depends heavily on how you define efficiency; television CPMs are generally lower for broad audiences, while digital CPMs are lower for precisely targeted niche audiences. The most effective approach, which is what we recommend to most of our clients, is to use television for mass reach and brand building, and digital for audience extension, personalisation, and lower-funnel conversion.

Q: What are the most common mistakes Indian brands make in digital media planning?

The most expensive mistake, in our experience, is treating digital as a single channel rather than a portfolio of distinct formats with different roles and different measurement frameworks. Brands that optimise their entire digital budget for short-term conversion metrics tend to underinvest in upper-funnel digital formats, which creates a situation where the conversion funnel is efficient but the top of the funnel is starved — which shows up as declining brand health metrics over time. The second most common mistake is underinvesting in creative quality relative to media spend; we have seen campaigns where the media plan was excellent but the creative was generic, and the results were consistently disappointing. The third mistake is ignoring regional language digital inventory, which tends to be underpriced relative to its audience quality and is particularly valuable for brands trying to reach consumers in Tier 2 and Tier 3 markets.

Q: How should a brand approach influencer marketing as part of its digital media plan?

Influencer marketing works best when it is treated as a content and credibility channel rather than a reach channel, which is a distinction that matters a great deal for how you evaluate its effectiveness. The reach numbers that influencer campaigns generate are often less impressive than what the same budget would deliver through paid media; where influencers genuinely add value is in the authenticity and contextual relevance of the content they create, which can drive engagement and consideration in ways that conventional advertising formats struggle to replicate. The selection of influencers should be driven by audience alignment and content quality rather than follower count, which is a lesson that most brands learn the hard way after a campaign with a high-follower influencer delivers disappointing engagement because the audience was not genuinely relevant. We generally recommend that influencer marketing represent no more than 15 to 20 percent of a brand's digital budget, with the remainder allocated to paid formats that offer more predictable reach and frequency delivery.

Q: What is the role of connected TV and OTT advertising in the Indian market?

Connected TV and OTT advertising represent one of the genuinely interesting format developments of the last three years, offering the combination of television-quality video content with digital-grade audience targeting that neither traditional television nor standard digital video can deliver on its own. The OTT audience in India has grown substantially, with platforms like JioCinema, Hotstar, SonyLIV, and Zee5 collectively reaching hundreds of millions of users; the advertising inventory on these platforms is priced at a premium relative to standard digital video, with CPMs typically in the range of ₹200 to ₹500, but the quality of the attention and the precision of the targeting tend to justify the premium for brands with specific audience requirements. The challenge is that the OTT audience, while large in aggregate, is fragmented across multiple platforms with different subscription and ad-supported tiers, which means that reaching meaningful scale requires either a significant budget or careful platform selection based on where the target audience is concentrated.

Q: How should brands think about measuring the effectiveness of their digital advertising in India?

Measurement is genuinely the hardest part of digital advertising, and the brands that get it right tend to be the ones that invest in measurement infrastructure before they start spending on media rather than trying to retrofit measurement after the fact. The most important principle is to define success in business terms — sales, trial, consideration, or brand health — rather than in media terms like impressions, clicks, or reach, because media metrics are means to an end rather than ends in themselves. Marketing Mix Modelling is the gold standard for understanding the relative contribution of different media channels to business outcomes, but it requires a minimum of 18 to 24 months of data to generate reliable results, which means it is a long-term investment rather than a campaign-level tool. For shorter-term measurement, brand lift studies — which measure the impact of advertising exposure on brand awareness, consideration, and purchase intent — are available through most major digital platforms and provide a useful supplement to the conversion metrics that tend to dominate digital reporting.

The Bigger Picture: Where Indian Advertising Is Heading

The trajectory of Indian advertising over the next five years is genuinely exciting, not because any single format is going to "win" but because the overall market is expanding in ways that create real opportunities for brands willing to think carefully about how they allocate their media investment. The combination of rising incomes, deepening internet penetration, the expansion of connected TV, and the continued strength of traditional media in non-metro markets creates a media landscape that is more complex than it has ever been — but also more full of opportunity for brands that approach it with rigour and genuine market understanding.

Digital advertising will continue to grow as a share of total spend, driven by the expansion of the addressable digital audience and the continued improvement of targeting and measurement capabilities; the Dentsu e4m and GroupM TYNY reports have both projected digital's share of total advertising spend reaching somewhere between 45 and 50 percent within the next three to four years, which would represent a significant shift from where it is today. What is less certain — and what we think is underappreciated in most industry forecasts — is the degree to which traditional media will continue to hold its ground in the markets and audience segments where it has always been strongest. The brands that perform best in this environment will be the ones that resist the temptation to treat media planning as a binary choice between digital and traditional, and instead build genuinely integrated plans that use each format for what it does best.

At SmartAds, our work across 500-plus cities has given us a perspective on Indian advertising that is genuinely difficult to replicate from a single-city or single-channel vantage point; we have seen what works in Ludhiana and what works in Kochi, what resonates with a Tier 2 audience in Rajasthan and what drives consideration in the premium segments of Bengaluru. If you are trying to build a media plan that reflects the actual complexity and opportunity of the Indian market — rather than a plan that looks good in a spreadsheet but underperforms in the real world — we would be glad to bring that perspective to your next planning cycle. You can reach the SmartAds media planning team at SmartAds.in, where we offer customised media planning across every channel and every market in the country.